Simpatico

Licensing / co-brand · showcase

Dodgers streetwear collaboration screen

Buyer audience: Los Angeles Dodgers · started Oct 23, 09:57 PM UTC · Qloo calls: 1 live, 135 from cache

PipelineAblation
Screened
25
Analysed
8
Verdicts
2 pass, 5 watch, 1 advance
Claims judged
0 kept, 0 rejected
Outreach drafts
1 awaiting approval

Ranked shortlist

#TargetFVerdictm1m2m3m4m5m6Coverage
1Mitchell & Ness
Part of another group: Fanatics
68.5Advance0.800.350.890.910.33–95%
2Nike
Independent
66.8Watch0.840.250.860.400.52–95%
3New Era Cap
Owner unknown
66.6Watch0.850.360.830.520.40–95%
447
Part of another group: Twins Enterprise, Inc.
65.6Watch0.860.370.860.540.29–95%
5Vans
Part of another group: VF Corporation
64.2Watch0.760.190.810.550.53–95%
6Supreme
Part of another group: VF Corporation
63.9Watch0.770.180.850.570.46–95%
7Adidas
Independent
61.8Pass0.790.210.850.390.41–95%
8Lululemon
Independent
60.6Pass0.760.170.800.230.54–95%

m1 two-way affinity · m2 taste overlap · m3 cross-domain agreement · m4 demographics · m5 geographic footprint · m6 momentum. “–” = Qloo could not measure it; it drops out of F rather than counting as zero.

Number check passed: 27 number(s), all in the evidence ledger.Written from the ledger template

Dodgers streetwear collaboration screen

Buyer audience: Los Angeles Dodgers. Run 2026-10-23; momentum window to 2026-10-23.

#TargetFVerdictCoverage
1Mitchell & Ness68.5ADVANCE95%
2Nike66.8WATCH95%
3New Era Cap66.6WATCH95%
44765.6WATCH95%
5Vans64.2WATCH95%
6Supreme63.9WATCH95%
7Adidas61.8PASS95%
8Lululemon60.6PASS95%

Outreach

0 draft(s) waiting for human approval in the approvals inbox. Nothing sends without it.

Whole universe: stage-1 screen (25 brands)

One Qloo rank call scores every candidate for the buyer’s audience (forward affinity). The top 8 plus pinned brands get the full analysis.

#BrandForward affinityQloo popularityOwnershipAnalysed
1470.860.93Part of another groupyes
2New Era Cap0.850.98Owner unknownyes
3Nike0.841.00Independentyes
4Mitchell & Ness0.800.97Part of another groupyes
5Adidas0.791.00Independentyes
6Supreme0.771.00Part of another groupyes
7Vans0.761.00Part of another groupyes
8Lululemon0.761.00Independentyes
9Fear Of God0.760.99Owner unknown
10Stüssy0.751.00Owner unknown
11Converse0.751.00Part of another group
12Kith0.750.99Owner unknown
13The North Face0.741.00Part of another group
14A Bathing Ape0.741.00Part of another group
15Carhartt0.730.97Owner unknown
16Champion0.721.00Part of another group
17Patagonia0.721.00Owner unknown
18Off-white0.711.00Part of another group
19Golf Wang0.710.98Owner unknown
20Palace Skateboards0.700.98Owner unknown
21R H U D E0.690.92Owner unknown
22Noah Clothing0.670.92Owner unknown
23Awake NY0.630.72Owner unknown
24Stone Island0.630.98Part of another group
25Online Ceramics0.620.76Owner unknown

Momentum window: 24 weeks to 2026-10-23, relative to a cohort of 9 brands.

Run log
  1. Resolving 27 name(s) against Qloo's brand catalogue...
  2. 1 name(s) are ambiguous in Qloo. Confirm them to continue.
  3. Confirmed 0 name(s), dropped 1.
  4. Resolving 26 name(s) against Qloo's brand catalogue...
  5. Buyer signal: Los Angeles Dodgers. Universe: 25 brands.
  6. Ranking 25 brands against the buyer's audience...
  7. Shortlisted 8: 47, New Era Cap, Nike, Mitchell & Ness, Adidas, Supreme, Vans, Lululemon.
  8. Analysing 8 target(s) on six audience metrics (asking Qloo ~80 questions)...
  9. Qloo evidence in for Mitchell & Ness (1/8).
  10. Qloo evidence in for Nike (2/8).
  11. Qloo evidence in for Supreme (3/8).
  12. Qloo evidence in for Adidas (4/8).
  13. Qloo evidence in for 47 (6/8).
  14. Qloo evidence in for New Era Cap (5/8).
  15. Qloo evidence in for Lululemon (7/8).
  16. Qloo evidence in for Vans (8/8).
  17. Analysed Nike (1/8): 5/6 metrics measured.
  18. Analysed Adidas (2/8): 5/6 metrics measured.
  19. Analysed 47 (3/8): 5/6 metrics measured.
  20. Analysed New Era Cap (5/8): 5/6 metrics measured.
  21. Analysed Mitchell & Ness (4/8): 5/6 metrics measured.
  22. Analysed Supreme (7/8): 5/6 metrics measured.
  23. Analysed Vans (6/8): 5/6 metrics measured.
  24. Analysed Lululemon (8/8): 5/6 metrics measured.
  25. Scoring in code: composite, coverage, red flags...
  26. Scored 8 target(s): 5 WATCH, 1 ADVANCE, 2 PASS (before debate).
  27. No LLM is configured, so the bull/bear debate was skipped. Verdicts come from the code rules alone (no mitigations).
  28. Writing 6 IC memo(s); every number is checked against the ledger...
  29. Memo for Mitchell & Ness: 10 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
  30. Memo for Vans: 11 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
  31. Memo for Nike: 11 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
  32. Memo for New Era Cap: 11 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
  33. Memo for 47: 12 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
  34. Memo for Supreme: 11 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
  35. Acting: pipeline board, outreach drafts (human approval required), monitor registration...
  36. Pinned 109 Qloo responses for replay of this showcase scenario (private server-side cache).
  37. Pipeline updated for 8 target(s); 1 outreach draft(s) waiting for approval.
  38. Done: 1 ADVANCE, 5 WATCH, 2 PASS.