Licensing / co-brand · showcase

Dodgers streetwear collaboration screen

Buyer audience: Los Angeles Dodgers · started Oct 27, 01:10 PM UTC · Qloo calls: 0 live, 136 from cache

Pipeline Ablation

Replayed from Qloo responses recorded in the private server-side cache. “Re-run live” re-queries Qloo.

Screened

Analysed

Verdicts

2 pass, 5 watch, 1 advance

Claims judged

68 kept, 11 rejected

Outreach drafts

1 awaiting approval

Ranked shortlist

#	Target	F	Verdict	m1	m2	m3	m4	m5	m6	Coverage
1	Mitchell & Ness Part of another group: Fanatics	68.0	Advance	0.80	0.35	0.89	0.91	0.33	0.58	100%
2	Nike Independent	66.0	Watch	0.84	0.25	0.86	0.40	0.52	0.50	100%
3	New Era Cap Owner unknown	65.9	Watch	0.85	0.36	0.83	0.52	0.40	0.52	100%
4	47 Part of another group: Twins Enterprise, Inc.	65.4	Watch	0.86	0.37	0.86	0.54	0.29	0.62	100%
5	Vans Part of another group: VF Corporation	63.5	Watch	0.76	0.19	0.81	0.55	0.53	0.50	100%
6	Supreme Part of another group: VF Corporation	63.2	Watch	0.77	0.18	0.85	0.57	0.46	0.50	100%
7	Adidas Independent	61.2	Pass	0.79	0.21	0.85	0.39	0.41	0.51	100%
8	Lululemon Independent	60.2	Pass	0.76	0.17	0.80	0.23	0.54	0.52	100%

m1 two-way affinity · m2 taste overlap · m3 cross-domain agreement · m4 demographics · m5 geographic footprint · m6 momentum. “–” = Qloo could not measure it; it drops out of F rather than counting as zero.

Number check passed: 27 number(s), all in the evidence ledger.Written from the ledger template

Dodgers streetwear collaboration screen

Buyer audience: Los Angeles Dodgers. Run 2026-10-27; momentum window to 2025-10-01.

#	Target	F	Verdict	Coverage
1	Mitchell & Ness	68.0	ADVANCE	100%
2	Nike	66.0	WATCH	100%
3	New Era Cap	65.9	WATCH	100%
4	47	65.4	WATCH	100%
5	Vans	63.5	WATCH	100%
6	Supreme	63.2	WATCH	100%
7	Adidas	61.2	PASS	100%
8	Lululemon	60.2	PASS	100%

Outreach

1 draft(s) waiting for human approval in the approvals inbox. Nothing sends without it.

Whole universe: stage-1 screen (25 brands)

One Qloo rank call scores every candidate for the buyer’s audience (forward affinity). The top 8 plus pinned brands get the full analysis.

#	Brand	Forward affinity	Qloo popularity	Ownership	Analysed
1	47	0.86	0.93	Part of another group	yes
2	New Era Cap	0.85	0.98	Owner unknown	yes
3	Nike	0.84	1.00	Independent	yes
4	Mitchell & Ness	0.80	0.97	Part of another group	yes
5	Adidas	0.79	1.00	Independent	yes
6	Supreme	0.77	1.00	Part of another group	yes
7	Vans	0.76	1.00	Part of another group	yes
8	Lululemon	0.76	1.00	Independent	yes
9	Fear Of God	0.76	0.99	Owner unknown
10	Stüssy	0.75	1.00	Owner unknown
11	Converse	0.75	1.00	Part of another group
12	Kith	0.75	0.99	Owner unknown
13	The North Face	0.74	1.00	Part of another group
14	A Bathing Ape	0.74	1.00	Part of another group
15	Carhartt	0.73	0.97	Owner unknown
16	Champion	0.72	1.00	Part of another group
17	Patagonia	0.72	1.00	Owner unknown
18	Off-white	0.71	1.00	Part of another group
19	Golf Wang	0.71	0.98	Owner unknown
20	Palace Skateboards	0.70	0.98	Owner unknown
21	R H U D E	0.69	0.92	Owner unknown
22	Noah Clothing	0.67	0.92	Owner unknown
23	Awake NY	0.63	0.72	Owner unknown
24	Stone Island	0.63	0.98	Part of another group
25	Online Ceramics	0.62	0.76	Owner unknown

Momentum window: 24 weeks to 2025-10-01, relative to a cohort of 9 brands.

Run log

Resolving 27 name(s) against Qloo's brand catalogue...
1 name(s) are ambiguous in Qloo. Confirm them to continue.
Confirmed 0 name(s), dropped 1.
Resolving 26 name(s) against Qloo's brand catalogue...
Buyer signal: Los Angeles Dodgers. Universe: 25 brands.
Ranking 25 brands against the buyer's audience...
Shortlisted 8: 47, New Era Cap, Nike, Mitchell & Ness, Adidas, Supreme, Vans, Lululemon.
Analysing 8 target(s) on six audience metrics (asking Qloo ~80 questions)...
Qloo evidence in for Supreme (2/8).
Qloo evidence in for New Era Cap (1/8).
Qloo evidence in for Nike (3/8).
Qloo evidence in for Adidas (5/8).
Qloo evidence in for Mitchell & Ness (4/8).
Qloo evidence in for 47 (6/8).
Qloo evidence in for Vans (7/8).
Qloo evidence in for Lululemon (8/8).
Analysed Nike (1/8): 6/6 metrics measured.
Analysed New Era Cap (2/8): 6/6 metrics measured.
Analysed Adidas (3/8): 6/6 metrics measured.
Analysed Mitchell & Ness (4/8): 6/6 metrics measured.
Analysed Supreme (6/8): 6/6 metrics measured.
Analysed 47 (5/8): 6/6 metrics measured.
Analysed Lululemon (8/8): 6/6 metrics measured.
Analysed Vans (7/8): 6/6 metrics measured.
Scoring in code: composite, coverage, red flags...
Scored 8 target(s): 5 WATCH, 1 ADVANCE, 2 PASS (before debate).
Debating 8 target(s): bull vs bear, judged in code against the ledger...
47: 8 of 10 claims validated -> WATCH.
Bear claim rejected for 47: cites m2 Taste-profile overlap "buyerTop20MissingShare" = 0.35 as a weakness, but it is above the shortlist average (0.475)
Bear claim rejected for 47: cites Composite score "F" = 65.4472 as a weakness, but it is above the shortlist average (64.1762)
Mitchell & Ness: 8 of 10 claims validated -> ADVANCE.
Bear claim rejected for Mitchell & Ness: cites m2 Taste-profile overlap "value" = 0.3549 as a weakness, but it is above the shortlist average (0.2621)
Bear claim rejected for Mitchell & Ness: cites Composite score "F" = 68.0008 as a weakness, but it is above the shortlist average (64.1762)
Nike: 9 of 9 claims validated -> WATCH.
Adidas: 10 of 10 claims validated -> PASS.
New Era Cap: 10 of 10 claims validated -> WATCH.
Vans: 7 of 10 claims validated -> WATCH.
Bull claim rejected for Vans: cites m3 Cross-domain agreement "value" = 0.8142 as a strength, but it is below the shortlist average (0.8442)
Bull claim rejected for Vans: cites Composite score "F" = 63.4585 as a strength, but it is below the shortlist average (64.1762)
Bear claim rejected for Vans: cites m3 Cross-domain agreement "domains[3].score" = 0.807 as a weakness, but it is above the shortlist average (0.805)
Supreme: 6 of 10 claims validated -> WATCH.
Bear claim rejected for Supreme: cited 0.8058 for m1 Two-way audience affinity "value", but the ledger says 0.7727
Bear claim rejected for Supreme: cited 0.475 for m2 Taste-profile overlap "buyerTop20MissingShare", but the ledger says 0.65
Bear claim rejected for Supreme: cited 64.1762 for Composite score "F", but the ledger says 63.2158
Lululemon: 10 of 10 claims validated -> PASS.
Writing 6 IC memo(s); every number is checked against the ledger...
Memo for Mitchell & Ness: 23 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
Memo for 47: 27 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
Memo for New Era Cap: 25 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
Memo for Nike: 28 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
Memo for Supreme: 31 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
Memo for Vans: 39 numbers checked, all in the ledger.
Acting: pipeline board, outreach drafts (human approval required), monitor registration...
Pinned 109 Qloo responses for replay of this showcase scenario (private server-side cache).
Pipeline updated for 8 target(s); 1 outreach draft(s) waiting for approval.
Done: 1 ADVANCE, 5 WATCH, 2 PASS.